🔗 Share this article

A coalition of those harmed during the state-led suppression amid the 2022 demonstrations for "Women, Life, Freedom" has initiated a pioneering judicial filing targeting forty named Iranian authorities of alleged international crimes.

Case Filing Launched in the Argentinian System

The petition for a judicial probe to be commenced was lodged within the Argentine judicial framework. This action was made by a coalition with support from a non-governmental documentation center. Argentina's courts are noted for accepting cases based on universal jurisdiction.

The document claims that the actions from state security apparatus to the protests included "discharging live ammunition, paintball guns, metal pellets designed for short distances, and additional ammunition at demonstrators." The case further states mass arrests, abuse while imprisoned, and killings of participants that reportedly continue to this day.

Confidential Names

Named individuals from within the range of Iran's intelligence apparatus have been identified in the filing, but their personal details are currently being withheld from the public.

Victim Testimonies Drive the Case

One of the complainants, based in Britain Mahsa Piraei, commented that the purpose "is not personal vengeance in a personal sense, but responsibility and transparency." Her mother, Minoo Majidi, aged 62, was killed by gunfire in September 2022. Autopsy reports indicated more than 167 harmful shots had been fired into her posterior at point-blank range. She had been participating in a gathering over the killing of Mahsa Amini, a youthful Kurdish woman who was killed in custody.

Piraei, among Majidi's three offspring, was based abroad at the moment of her parent's brutal death. She returned to Iran at great risk to pay respects at the burial site. Her sister Roya posted a picture of herself by their resting place with her scalp shaved on a personal social media account. A acquaintance circulated the photograph, which was widely shared, eventually leading Roya to leave for Turkey.

Piraei stated: "Via court documents and evidence the intention is to maintain records, name crimes and stop the disappearance." She described her parent's killing as "not an isolated incident but part of a systematic practice."

Additional Complainants Consist of Individuals Who Lost Sight

The remaining claimants who are named are Kowsar Eftekhari and Mersedeh Shahinkar, both victims of loss of sight at short distance by paintball guns.

Eftekhari, a university-aged scholar, was struck in the right eye in autumn 2022. She had been demonstrating for an extended period, observing fellow protesters being hit by live ammunition and being assaulted herself with stun devices. During a gathering on October 12th, she was at a rally near a university when a plainclothes officer fired at her with several projectiles from a distance of about a yard. He then reportedly targeted her face when she did not respond to his command to disperse. A video of the assault depicting blood pouring from her eye spread online, and she was subsequently granted asylum in Germany.

Shahinkar, aged 38 when attacked on October 18th, only understood what had occurred when she sensed something wet on her eye. Fellow demonstrators warned her not to get into an emergency vehicle for fear of being delivered to a authority holding area. When she later reached a treatment facility, a worker ordered her to leave because they refused to assist protesters. A medical professional saw her and directed her to a hospital, where Shahinkar claimed a stone had accidentally injured her vision so she would not be denied treatment. She shared images of her injuries online, and in the new year, individuals confronted her, prompting her to leave the country. She later collected a notable human rights prize as a symbol of the movement.

Global Legal Concept Provides Basis for Action

The group seeking the legal probe say that the filing is not seen just as a legal complaint with slim prospect of a practical outcome. The concept allows cases to be investigated in a third country even if the crime did not occur in that jurisdiction and the suspect is not located there. Argentina has some of the most liberal rules on such cases in the world.

The doctrine of universal jurisdiction has historically resulted in multiple guilty verdicts and the initiation of investigations covering crimes perpetrated in many states. Proceedings are currently being pursued in various nations worldwide.

As the application is only for a judicial probe, and this is not a case for damages, there is no demand by the individuals for money damages. This case would not represent the initial legal action against Iranian authorities initiated in Argentina.